evidoria

What works in Kuala Lumpur

All catalogues · Malaysia profile

4
evaluated practices
71/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 4 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +48 pts 100 here · 52 average

Governance, capability & sustainability +34 pts 100 here · 66 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +23 pts 83 here · 60 average

Scalability beyond pilot +23 pts 89 here · 66 average

Sustainability +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average

Evidence of learning impact -30 pts 0 here · 30 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -50 pts 0 here · 50 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 52
Governance, capability & sustainability
100 · 66
Curator validation
100 · 75
Evidence of impact / measured public value
83 · 60
Scalability beyond pilot
89 · 66
Sustainability
100 · 80
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Transferability / demonstrated replication
67 · 59
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Innovation
67 · 64
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 39
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 41
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 78
Equity & inclusion
33 · 54
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 30
Transparency, ethics & data protection
0 · 50

Coloured bar: Kuala Lumpur. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance 2021 — 30% Women-Director Target for Listed Companies · 96

Malaysia National Fraud Portal — AI-powered real-time anti-scam network for financial intelligence · 87

MTDC — Malaysia's State Technology-Commercialisation & Venture Capital Corporation · 67

Gemini for Education — Google and Malaysia's Ministry of Higher Education Deploy AI Across All Public Universities · 33

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence

Smart City Wien Framework Strategy · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more